notablog - Why I don't always go for free - Commentaires2024-02-14T11:34:52+01:00urn:md5:e838f6103b73d5ce71306164b60e8cbcDotclearWhy I don't always go for free - adamurn:md5:b8b8d784d3d33336a112f81190d6be7c2007-07-27T11:11:23+00:002007-07-27T11:11:23+00:00adam<p>Couldn't the same be said for any material, text or image? Is mis-quoting, for example, simply a freedom inherited through open licenses? I think this is what the GFDL is trying to stop with its invariant sections. ie. to stop editorial voice from being misrepresented. I don't like the license but I can see its intention.</p>
<p>Perhaps it might be possible to include images as invariant? That way material licensed through the gfdl could not be taken out of its context....</p>
<p>However, I don't advocate the gfdl, it's fatally flawed.</p>Why I don't always go for free - pfctdayeliseurn:md5:345abc2fd8009143ad3480354f85f9102007-07-26T04:02:10+00:002007-07-26T04:02:10+00:00pfctdayelise<p>I'm with you. The only photos I've copylefted that have had people in them have been wikimeetups. I would never copyleft pictures of my friends and family. My test has always been "could I accept a cigarette smoking company using this on a billboard?" which is pretty outlandish, but maybe it should now be "could I accept Virgin Mobile using this in a lame bus stop ad"?</p>